CliniGA CRO

CliniGA CRO Blog

Combining clinical and technical evidence in device failure review

Do not automatically equate a technical test result with the explanation of a participant event.

Representative research photograph: Combining clinical and technical evidence in device failure review
Photo: EU2016 NL from The Netherlands · License: CC BY 2.0 · Cropped and resized.
Published
Updated

A device functioning normally in a laboratory does not establish that a reported problem never occurred. Conversely, a technical nonconformity does not prove that it caused every clinical event. Link clinical and technical assessments while preserving their separate conclusions.

Define the assessment

Record the returned unit’s condition, conditions during use and limitations of the investigation method. Failure to reproduce a problem and exclusion of the problem are different conclusions. Explain which questions belong to technical specialists, investigators and safety reviewers rather than forcing uncertainty into one definitive failure code.

Worked example

In a hypothetical procedure, a device produces intermittent signal loss but passes a bench test after return. The team examines cable movement, temperature and connection logs. It finds that the test did not represent those conditions. The participant event remains documented while technical assessment is reconsidered; a normal bench result is not reported as proof of no event.

Practical checks

  • Link return, handling and examination history to the condition of the device during use.
  • Explain how closely the technical test represents the suspected failure conditions.
  • Record clinical causality and technical root-cause conclusions separately through authorised reviewers.

Decision and limitations

The report should distinguish confirmed findings, excluded explanations and unresolved questions. An unidentified root cause does not automatically end follow-up. Route recurring patterns and safety implications into appropriate oversight, without unsupported blame of participants or operators.

Frequently asked questions

Does an unreproduced failure close the event?
Not automatically. Consider investigation limitations, other records and participant impact together.
Is technical root cause the same as clinical causality?
No. The relationship between a technical finding and the clinical event needs a separate qualified assessment.

Sources

  1. MDCG 2024-3 — Clinical investigation plan
  2. MDCG 2024-5 — Investigator brochure